Gucci Rush Perfume: Boring

I’m usually way more diplomatic, both in this perfume blog and IRL, but in spite of the great popularity that Perfume Rush Gucci still enjoys, I couldn’t help it: what’s there to like, really?

 

A faint sugar-sweet peachy floral (namely, gardenia) that is neither fish nor fowl, smelling synthetic all the way and in a bad way, and with sweet notes that are neither graceful nor attractive.

 

It was created in 1999 by Michel Almairac (Chloe EdP), but I think it came at least 15 years too late: the patina of inexpressiveness of the notes would have perfectly suited a dance floor of the Eighties with their electro-pop.

 

And yet, among the Gucci perfumes still on the market, Gucci Rush 1 is the second oldest after Envy, Luca Turin in Perfumes: The A-Z Guide, gives  it five stars, and Chandler Burr calls it an “ingenious piece of abstract art” in The Perfect Scent: A Year Inside the Perfume Industry in Paris and New York. So what’s the story with that?

 

If it’s an abstract art masterpiece, it all makes sense then. It’s like being in a modern art museum, with this painting showing a white square with a diagonal black line, and although you read in the guide how and why this is a great work of art, you just go “whatever” and move on. The Pyrrhic revenge of the layman.

 

If this perfume was a color it would be this:
Perfume Gucci Rush    

 

perfume Gucci Rush

Gucci Rush Review

Do you love this perfume? Do you hate it? Tell me all about it!

*

Not what you’re looking for? Use the search bar below


Custom Search